The towers fell. An inside job. There were no hijackers. A recipe for endless war. Surely not! Isn’t that just a conspiracy theory?

Curiously, the facts support the “inside job” theory. Consider:

Two tall buildings were supposedly struck by aircraft, three fell. The buildings were so over-constructed that the effect of such an event should have been like a pin going through a mosquito net, i.e. no effect. The buildings were constructed to resist multiple aircraft.

A third tower fell later the same day, WTC building 7. It was not hit by any plane. Yet, like WTC 1 and 2, it collapsed neatly onto its own footprint, with most of its mass being turned to dust, i.e. the debris pile did not contain all the debris expected.

Never before in history has fire caused a steel skyscraper to collapse. In Madrid, such a skyscraper burned for 20 hours, before the fire was extinguished. It did not collapse.

So what, logically did collapse the three buildings? The melting point of steel is around 2700 degrees, but the highest burning temperature of jet fuel is around 1800 degrees. So no way could kerosene from jets have caused the disasters.

An aircraft is mostly lightweight aluminium, apart from the engines, which are titanium and steel. If aircraft had truly hit those buildings, the wings would have sheared off, spun out, and crashed on some neighbouring building or ground. Yet nothing of the sort happened. And the “black box” flight recorders were never found, yet they are designed to be resistant to any conceivable disaster. In the case of an aircraft supposedly hitting the Pentagon, the small hole in the building is far narrower than such an aircraft would make. And does not allow for the wingspan or high tail. That hole matches a missile.

In New York some eyewitnesses clearly describe a missile.

The films we have been shown endlessly of the New York disasters have all the hallmarks of video manipulation. You can slow down the footage and see the planes appear to dissolve into the buildings at impact.

There were at least thirteen “terror drills” being run by the US government and security agencies on 9/11. Some of these exercises actually imagined aircraft being hijacked and crashed into high-value buildings, to test how emergency services would react. The real events then happened under the cover of the drills. Details of these exercises are found in the references.

The best explanations for the World Trade Center disasters are either controlled demolition (charges having been previously positioned inside the three buildings), nano-technology, or energy beams from a “Star Wars” device zapping them. There is much evidence to back these possibilities, but I won’t go into them here or this would be a 10,000 page article. Instead, look at the evidence online collected by the academics of Scholars for 911 Truth, view the movie “Loose Change”, and read the book “911 Synthetic Terror: made in USA.”

Many folk today dismiss most utterances of Bush and gang on Iraq, on human rights, and on everything else, yet are happy to believe him on 911. This won’t do. To accept his version of 911 gives his regime their needed excuse to make endless war. “A war on terror?” You might just as well have a “war on jealousy.” Such a thing is open-ended and illogical (and un-winnable), but serves the regime and gave them the excuse to invade Afghanistan and Iraq and others in the future, as well as the excuse to clamp down on human rights. It reminds us of previous “inside job” provocations, such as Pearl Harbour, the 1933 Reichstag Fire, and the blowing-up of the USS Maine in Havana harbour (that was the excuse for the Spanish-American war of 1898). And look what resulted from those!

References:

“911 Synthetic Terror: Made in U.S.A.” by W.G. Tarpley (2006, Progressive Press, Calif. 2nd edition.)
Loose Change. Movie by Dylan Avery et al.
See it at www.loosechange911.com
Professor Judy Wood’s website:
www.drjudywood.com
Scholars for 911 Truth website: www.911scholars.org
No planes! Google “September clues” for the video.
Google “David Ray Griffin”